英のEU離脱の波紋

June 20, 2016

6月23日、英国の欧州連合(EU)離脱の是非を問う国民投票。物や人の移動に対しバリケードを築くことに成る「離脱」。さらにはMoneyの移動にも影響を与える離脱は本当に賢明な選択肢なのか。英国国民がいずれを選ぶのかは間もなく判明する・・・

英国は1973年に欧州の病人としてEUに加盟して以来43年間の英国の1人当たり国内総生産(GDP)の伸び率は年平均1.8%と、ドイツの1.7%、フランスの1.4%、イタリアの1.3%を上回る。

 加盟したことで、英企業は競争に直面し鍛えられ、同時に単一市場へのアクセスを得、さらに海外から大規模な長期投資がなされるなど英国は大きな利益を受けてきた。よく聞く、EUが英国の発展の足かせになっているという主張は根拠が気薄である。

 ロシアの領土を取り戻そうとする行為、核拡散、「イスラム国」(IS)のテロ、中東やアフリカ北部からの際限のない移民流入、国際的な犯罪組織ネットワーク、気候変動などはすべてが集団的な対応を必要とする脅威である。英国のEU離脱は欧州を弱体化させ、こうした脅威への対処を難しくする。同時に英国をも弱体化させていく。

 離脱派の考え方には、道徳や倫理観といった発想に欠け、英国も「欧州人権裁判所」創設の原動力だったことも忘れている。英国への移住者は犯罪者、たかり屋として悪者扱いされる。英国よ! 紳士たれ。

 

【以下は Financial Timesからの引用】

June 16, 2016 1:13 pm

The dubious lure of taking on the elite

 

 

Philip Stephens

 

The dirty little secret of EU membership is that it has been an economic success story

 

Brexiters are courting a protest vote. Fed up with Brussels? Worried about immigration? Then vote Leave. In real life the June 23 referendum presents a choice — the most important the British have faced during the postwar period. The status quo has to be measured against the alternative. Is throwing up the barricades really an intelligent option? We will know soon enough which question the voters choose to answer.

Most of the time such confusions scarcely matter. The great thing about democracy is that citizens get a chance to change their minds. If a bunch of politicians renege on their promises they can be turned out next time around. The Brexit referendum is different: its consequences are asymmetric. If Britain opts for Remain it could well think again in, say, a decade or two. A Leave vote would be forever and would set out the path to the break-up of the UK. It is easy to see where the balance of risk lies — and why the Leavers prefer boorish anti-intellectualism to rational debate about what Out would look like.

 

One puzzle for people peering in from beyond Britain’s shores is why now? True, the EU is not in the best of shape but it has weathered the multiple stresses of recent years. In truth, the referendum’s timing has nothing at all to do with substance. It is all about party management: David Cameron thought a referendum would keep the Conservatives in one piece. Not one of the prime minister’s smartest calls.

The consequences of an Out vote would reach well beyond the UK, even if one assumes that central banks have learnt how to deal with shocks on financial markets. Donald Tusk, the Polish president of the European Council, was probably exaggerating when he suggested it could mark a beginning to the end of western civilisation. But it would be a shattering blow to the rest of the EU and to the standing of what broadly constitutes the west. For Britain the short-term costs would be high. The long-term consequences, political and economic, would be profound.

There is nothing complicated or abstract about the case for European engagement: it rests on three pillars: national prosperity, security and attachment to values that many Brits would claim as their own — liberty, democracy and the rule of law. This in an age when the west’s interests and values are under rising challenge from autocrats across the globe.

The dirty little secret of EU membership is that it has been an economic success story. Britain joined in 1973 as the sick man of Europe. In the subsequent 43 years it has flourished. National output has risen faster than that of Germany, France and Italy. Per capita gross domestic product has increased by an average of 1.8 per cent annually, against 1.7 per cent in Germany, 1.4 per cent in France and 1.3 per cent in Italy.

Business has gained from sharper competition, ready access to the single market and big inflows of long-term investment. As the OECD records, Britain has also held on to the light-touch labour regulation that gives it an edge over its European partners. So much for the charge that Brussels has held Britain back.

 

 

 

 

News, comment and analysis on the referendum to decide whether Britain will leave the EU

 

Whisper it ever so quietly, but the economy has also benefited from the arrival of ambitious hard-working young people from the rest of the continent. The failure on immigration has been one of successive governments at Westminster that have denied cities and communities the resources needed to adjust to large flows of migrants.

Postwar prosperity has depended on security. The US commitment to act as the guarantor of peace on the European continent has been, and remains, in­extricably bound up with integration within the EU. Nato has primacy in military affairs, but the political and foreign policy cohesion provided by the union is equally important to Washington. It was the EU rather than Nato that imposed sanctions when Russia marched into Ukraine, and the EU that provided the opening for successful nuclear negotiations with Iran.

The revanchism of Russian president Vladimir Putin, nuclear proliferation, the terrorism of Isis, uncontrolled migration from the Maghreb and Sahel, inter­national criminal networks and climate change — all these present threats requiring a collective response. By weakening Europe, Brexit would
make it harder to address them; by weakening Britain they would diminish its capacity to shape the responses.

The pre-Enlightenment mindset of the Out campaign has little time for
values. Human rights are cast as a
European plot. Never mind that Britain was a moving force in creating the
European Court of Human Rights. Migrants are demonised as criminals and scroungers. Ironically, the self-styled upholders of parliamentary sovereignty want to overturn, well, parliamentary sovereignty: two-thirds of MPs oppose Brexit.

There is hard-headed interest here alongside the moral dimension. The open international system on which security and prosperity rest is in
turn rooted in the rule of law. Britain, with global interests, is particularly reliant on a rules-based system. Throw away the values underpinning the
rules and you invite a return to Hobbesian chaos.

None of this, one supposes, troubles Brexiters. Theirs is the mantra of populists through the ages: go on, give the establishment a kick. You can see the appeal. But look at the cost.

Please reload

特集記事

I'm busy working on my blog posts. Watch this space!

Please reload

最新記事
Please reload

アーカイブ